|
I have come to believe that so-called chivalrous acts, such as letting
women exit elevators before men and opening doors for women, are actually
institutionalized forms of control.
A man, stranger no less, designating when you--a woman--should or should
not enter a building or exit a subway car is akin to allowing a boy in the
alley to determine your outcome. (Of course! Two extremes on the same
continuum...) A woman's genteel passivity when offered an act of chivalry
merely reinforces men's feeling of domination and superiority. "Let's
allow the little lady on the bus first, we must protect and coddle her" or
"If I don't open the door for her, she'll be helpless and left outside."
Bogus, huh? I agree. As soon as we women give 'em one inch, they'll wanna
force six of 'em into us. The little unspoken agreements/negotiations of
door-opening and "ladies first-isms" provoke, I believe, an unconscious
(and maybe sometimes conscious) feeling of debt by you, the woman, to a
completely unknown stranger. After a few dozen years of opening doors for
you, a man must come to expect some return on his musculature. How can
this not be?
So, perhaps you're thinking, "Come on, are you suggesting that male
chivalry causes men to assault women?" Well, perhaps not so overtly. But
at the very least, there's a possibility of resentment and condescension
that can ensue from this societal behavior.
And now, that you're pressing me, I must tell you that I have deliberately
refused male chivalry and met with some interesting reactions. I used to
ride the little subway car in Fort Worth every morning whil I was in high
school. Several times I set out to do a little sociological
experimentation. Standing near the entranceway to the car--but not so I
was obstructing passage in or out of it--I was actually pushed (that means
foreign hands applying man-pressure on my body) towards the door by a guy
who insisted that I exit the car before he did. After recovering from his
apoplectic outburst, he seemed embarassed, and definitely confused.
[When the rat figures out the maze and refuses to scamper the gullies, does
the scientist sit down and cry?] I, refusing to be no rat--not even for
cheesey science--usually smile and suggest, "does it really matter who goes
first?"
And now, to really confuse you, let's move on to the exceptions. A) When I
am carrying two bags of firewood, a can of lighter fluid, and anything by
Camille Paglia, yes, you--you over there are definitely welcome to do me a
human (not man over woman, not demeaning, not power-brokering) favor by
opening the fucking door, already.
And B) if you are a man-buddy of mine, just-so happening to do the gentle
surprise of letting me pass before you, that to me, feels like positive
regard
and I'll even enjoy doing it for you--and I won't even grab your ass as you
pass through the portal first......Is that a deal or what?
|